Skip to main content

POLITICS: Humanist stance for the election

Dear Mrs Villiers,

While your response to my queries as to your stance on Humanist questions is balanced and measured in tone and content, I must say it fails to address issues which are key to fairness and secularism in Britain.

Your response ignores that worship is compulsory in many schools and that implies that the practice of religious discrimination in Faith Schools is allowable provided extra places are fairly allocated. If you believe it is right to refuse a 3 year-old a school place on the grounds that their parents worship the wrong holy book, you are misguided at best and at worst, actively promote faith discrimination. Convention does not make these practices ethical or beneficial to society.

With time, your support and that of your party for these revolting practices will be compared with the historical backwaters of sexual, ethnic and religious discrimination they emanated from.

Your party's stance on Assisted Dying belongs to that same swamp of ill-concealed superstition. It is a well-researched principle which provides those who need it with a dignified plan for their own death and is practiced uncontroversially in countries such as Canada. People should have a right to die with dignity and medical practitioners ought to be able to offer this option (with correct safeguards) without the threat of prosecution. The only arguments left standing against Assisted dying are plainly attributed to religious convention and belief in the supernatural. Once again in this issue religious privilege trumps rationality.

This is hardly surprising when unelected Bishops hold seats in the House of Lords. As you rightly point out the Labour party is as guilty of the failure to reform this shadowy, anti-democratic system as your own.

Thank you nonetheless for making your position plain. Your Labour opponent did not even bother to do so. I will choose accordingly in tomorrow's ballot.

Yours sincerely,

David K

On 6 May 2015, at 10:54, Emily <> wrote:


Popular posts from this blog

COMMENT: Rivoli Riding - why a Carpentras cinema has me needing therapy

"I don't know how to feel about this, whether to love it or hate it. I just don't know". And in one breath, a petite, gleeful Dutch lady smashes the quiet discomfort of a room full of viewers, mulling over the contradictions of the film. Chloe Zhao's The Rider is a semi-documentary-part-fiction, favourite of 2017 Cannes film festival, and swept up awards in Deauville, Toronto and more. The hubbub begins as the Carpentras anglophiles sit around a cluster of café-parisien-style tables on which glasses of Cotes-du-rhône red wine, bowls of snacks and steaming slices of (homemade) pizza are magically appearing, like a tiny, stylish Hogwarts school of arthouse cinema wizardry.

"But the photography..."
"And that actor, playing himself! How did he even..."
"Well, the director got a standing ovation. She's Chinese."
"Remind me, Laura, I need to give you a book"
"Did he play himself?"
"The horses... How do you say 'd…

PODCAST: Update on the podcast

Dear listener/reader,

As I'm sure you've noticed if you've been following, I've had to put the brakes on the podcast for a while. I enjoy podcasting immensely, but the schedule just wasn't reasonable.

I hope the incremental improvements in quality were noticeable although slight. I'm not trained in audio, and the tools I was using for editing and recording were very basic. To produce anything like decent content was taking up a huge amount of time and mental energy which I just couldn't sustain as a Dad of 3, full time teacher and generally insanely busy person.

I'd love to pick it up someday, in another form. Perhaps a short podcast series, or contributing to another Humanist podcast, or any show which shares similar goals and values. I've had a lot of ideas on this front, but nothing which seems achievable as of yet.

As I tried to mention at the open and close of each show, I'd love to hear from anyone who listened and found the content valuab…

LETTER: ASA complaint re London Psychic College

Dear Mr K,Your Complaint: The College of Psychic StudiesThank you for your patience while we considered your concerns.We have now considered your complaint and think you have a valid point.  While the webpage you complained about is no longer active on the site, we’ve instructed the college, and received an assurance from them, that they will present claims about a psychic’s ability as the psychic’s own opinion in future and will remove references to disease.Now we’ve resolved your complaint, basic information including the advertisers’ name and where the ad appeared will be published on our website, Wednesday 25 January.Thank you for taking the time and trouble to write to us.  If you’d like some more information about what we do and the action we’ve taken against advertisers who break the code, please have a look on our website.Kind regards,Sam FalkInvestigations Executive